Posted on March 13, 2013 at 9:52 am

Why Doesn’t Elie Wiesel Sue Me for Libel?

By Carolyn Yeager

Have you ever wondered that? I sure have. If this website Elie Wiesel Cons The World is telling lies about him, it would be the natural thing to do. In the same vein, if Elie Wiesel has the number A7713 tattooed on his arm, as he says he does, it would be very easy to show it to the world and put me out of business. It is inexplicable that he doesn’t do it if he could. The only logical conclusion to reach is that he can’t … because he doesn’t.

Not only does Elie Wiesel not sue me, he doesn’t go after Nikolaus Grüner either, who called him a liar before I did. Grüner did try to sue Elie Wiesel, though, but was prevented from doing so by the courts and legal systems that protect Wiesel according to Zionist orders.

I’m told the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum closely follows this blog. I have said many negative things about the museum, too. For instance, that it is a criminal conspiracy to  defraud the American people — certainly to defraud the American taxpayers out of fifty or so million dollars a year.  I have accused the USHMM of blatant lying, of perpetuating false information even after it knows it is false, of creating an atmosphere of hate against anyone Jews don’t like. And, yes, of being totally run by Jews for Jewish interests — not the interests of history — very similar to the OSI (Office of Special Investigations) in it’s disreputable and downright illegal tactics.

I will be doing a new article on the relationship between these organizations  — in 2010 the OSI was merged into the Human Rights and Special Prosecutions Section of the Domestic Security Section of the Justice Dept.

Elie Wiesel and the USHMM – a mutually beneficial relationship

I have previously written about the symbiotic connection between Elie Wiesel and the national holocaust museum he was instrumental in creating in this country – the USA. Built in Washington D.C. on federal ground amidst the national monuments to American history, this parasitical monstrosity pretends to be something that helps to insure the American idea of freedom and democratic principles around the world!

A faithful reader recently wrote to me:

Did you know the USHMM was closely following your blog?

Two weeks ago, I landed on the Oral History site; I did not intend to watch the VDO, but scrolling down the page, saw there was a clickable link to the transcript of the interview in .doc or .pdf format. That’s quite handy and I downloaded a couple every day till the 26th, when I posted my comment [here at EWCTW] with a link to their site on one of the rare  pages without a clickable link.  Guess what? – on the evening of the very same day each and every link had been disabled.

Well these testimonies have been recorded in the late 80s or early 90s, before the advent of the net and they believed they could get away with telling anything … (Bomba tells he dug a bunker in the ghetto for 50-60 people, loading it with food for 2 YEARS, apparently in a matter of days … to fifth-graders).

I am not surprised at that. I too see  changes based on what is exposed on Elie Wiesel Cons The World. Just one example is Wiesel’s now more secret visits to Chapman University after I so effectively panned his first visit as a “Distinguished Presidential Fellow” in March 2011,  based simply on what I read in the local and campus newspapers. We also had a fellow, Steve, pass out flyers at a Wiesel talk during that same visit. Since then, Wiesel’s visits and talks have been handled differently. In his 2012 visit to Chapman, there was no publicity and Wiesel only appeared to students in very private and secure settings. So far, there have been no announcements of his 2013 visit that I have seen.

So they react, but they are careful not to ever mention this web site or my name in any way. To object in any way about it or me would mean they would have to show, demonstrate, prove, provide evidence or give testimony that I am wrong. They know beforehand they cannot do that because they know they are the liars, not me. They depend on the news and entertainment media to keep the public believing they have noble aims.

I would have to say that Elie Wiesel and the USHMM are afraid to touch this web site because of the deep research I have done, to which they have no answers or rebuttal. Without the power of the media covering for them, and all branches of the U.S. government backing them, they would wither and die from their lack of credibility.

Their chosen method is to stay in generalities and avoid specifics

The powers that are behind Elie Wiesel and the USHMM know that they can only succeed by using generalizations like “hate,” “genocide,” “anti-Semitism,”  “religious persecution,” “6 million,” etc. along with such vague “legal” language as  “stirring up racial hatred” and “encouraging contempt for individuals or groups”.  No legal system that has acquiesced to what the Jews want in the way of protections for themselves will allow for  introduction of evidence that actually pertains to truth or falsehood of specific elements of the narrative.

Both Elie Wiesel and the USHMM make specific charges against those they call the perpetrators of evil, but they will never answer to the denial by said “perpetrators” that they committed these evils. Via the total postwar power assumed by the victors of World War II (those who brought about WWII in order to gain this power!), this question was never allowed consideration. Again, it was the media that did the job.

Legal Definition of libel

1) n. to publish in print (including pictures), writing or broadcast through radio, television or film, an untruth about another which will do harm to that person or his/her reputation, by tending to bring the target into ridicule, hatred, scorn or contempt of others.

What I do here seems to fit that (apart from the word “untruth”), but there is no response from those who are so targeted.  Of course, my intention is to discover and to tell the truth, not to slander. The only complaints I get are a few comments, and once in awhile an email, from ardent fans of Elie who chastise me for being insensitive to the man’s suffering — which to their illogic means to them he can have no reason to lie about it and would only tell the truth. (And if he doesn’t, well – that is excused on the same grounds.) To their thinking, Jewish suffering excuses all moral failings. These writers are mostly female and young, appearing as though they had looked up Elie Wiesel on the Internet,  come upon this site and were shocked by it. Unfortunately, these young’uns would be the first to use the “chosen method” described above, that is, to judge harm done according to “selected” peoples’ feelings. That is the only way anyone will ever touch it.

7 Comments to Why Doesn’t Elie Wiesel Sue Me for Libel?

  1. by Jerzy Ulicki-Rek

    On March 13, 2013 at 2:41 pm

    “Why Doesn’t Elie Wiesel Sue Me for Libel?”
    Because he knows that doing it in open ,at this time when more and more people is awake will be the end of his holo-show.

    Keep doing good work
    All the best


  2. by Fredrick Toben

    On March 13, 2013 at 4:49 pm

    Just be careful, Carolyn – all too often the legal mechanism gets under way through a false pretext, then if it succeeds they crow about the matter that was not the subject of the litigation.

    For example, the free speech-hate speech development could be used against you and then it is not a matter of you claiming truth as a defence but whether what you have written is ‘hate speech’, which in the Wiesel case – and his adopting the victim mindset – could be categorised as such.

    Just make certain that any of your property is in someone else’s name.

    …but keep it up because it is important for the welbeing of our society to expose such individuals. Anyone who lives on a lie, then is celebrated as a virtuous person, is committing an outrageous and obscene act of deceit and slander for which severe penalties ought to apply.
    But I am reminded that there is culpability on the part of those who are celebrating this fraudster.


  3. by JoshuaF

    On March 13, 2013 at 6:02 pm

    In their lying faces! Very HoLIECaustic! Terrific work Carolyn.


  4. by Robert Schmidt

    On March 14, 2013 at 1:43 am

    You do absolute sterling work Carolyn , why is not possible to bring Ellie Wiesel before a court . He did after all SWEAR in a court case with Eric Hunt that he has this tattoo . If he has not got the tattoo as he “SAYS” he has ….is that not a case of perjury?
    I firmly believe there has to be a way to bring before a court to prove this among other lies he has spewed .


  5. by Madi

    On March 18, 2013 at 7:14 am

    thats bogus how do you actually know its fake, you obviously were not there. So instead of making a whole website bashing him grow up and face him and ask him your self and be respectful. :)


  6. by wizardofoz

    On May 31, 2013 at 11:13 pm

    Great work, Carolyn, but Mr Toben’s advice is sound, and I concur completely.

    In 1998 the ADL initiated a nationwide competition (USA) for law students to draft ‘anti-hate’ legislation for minority groups. That competition was won by a man named Joseph Ribakoff, whose thesis proposed that not only must ‘hate’ motivated violence be banned, but also any words which stimulate: ‘Suspicion, Friction, Hate, and possible Violence, these must also be criminalised.

    This ADL prise-winning paper suggests that not only should State-Agencies monitor and restrict ‘free speech’ in general, but they should also censor all films that criticize identifiable groups! Furthermore, even if the person making the statement can justify it, for example Christians criticizing homosexuality because the bible expressly forbids it, Ribakoff asserts that the truth is to be NO defence in court.

    The only proof a court will need in order to secure a conviction of ‘hate speech’ is that something has been said, and a minority group or member of such has felt emotionally damage as a result of such criticism. Therefore, under these proposals, which the ADL have forced into law all over the world in less than fifteen-years. In this case Jesus Christ would have been arrested as a hate criminal.

    However, the liars will not come after you directly, they could win in court, but lose big-time with the hoi-polloi. But they are working on ways to shut you up, that’s for sure. God bless.



  1. time is running out for Elie Wiesel, famous (alleged) survivor of Auschwitz and Buchenwald | Scrapbookpages Blog

Leave a Reply

You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

By submitting a comment here you grant Elie Wiesel Cons the World a perpetual license to reproduce your words and name/web site in attribution. Inappropriate or irrelevant comments will be removed at an admin's discretion.

This website makes use of some non-original copyrighted material. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information Click Here