Posted on December 23, 2015 at 12:39 pm

Tattoo criminals – Elie Wiesel should be investigated for holocaust fraud

holo tattoo

This is the tattoo that, if seen by the public, will incite hatred for Jews, according to prosecutors and courts in Brandenburg, Germany. But why wouldn’t it incite sympathy just as well?

By Carolyn Yeager

In a Berlin court, a German man is convicted for having a tattoo resembling a concentration camp entrance on his body.

Why then is Elie Wiesel not convicted in Germany for not having a concentration camp tattoo on his body, but saying he does?

Wiesel was in Germany at least three times impersonating a “nazi” concentration camp survivor. His first visit was in June 1986 when he spoke in Loccum, West Germany as the author of the book Night, which he claims to be a record of his own experience. In Night, the main character is  tattooed with the number A7713 on his left forearm, which Elie claimed under oath in California is still there on his arm. Apparently, no one in Loccum asked to see it.

He returned the next year in November 1987 and spoke in a modern conference center inside the shell of the destroyed Reichstag. The title of his talk was “Reflections of a Survivor” in which he, as in the prior year, couldn’t keep from speaking words of blame toward the German people.

On June 5, 2009 he was at the Buchenwald Memorial outside of Weimar, accompanying the President of the United States and the Chancellor of Germany in the guise of a former resident of the camp. I know this for sure because I was in Dresden on this very day and watched it on German television.

Elie Wiesel's left arm in bright sunlight, from his video "Elie Wiesel Goes Home"

Elie Wiesel’s left arm in bright sunlight, taken from his video “Elie Wiesel Goes Home”

Elie Wiesel’s main authentication for being interned at both Auschwitz/Birkenau/Monowitz and at Buchenwald is the tattoo A7713 which matches records for a Lazar Wiesel from Sighet. Elie says he has it on his arm but he has never allowed the public to see it! He does not confirm his claim by showing his forearm, as do so many survivors – the very survivors he claims to be one with.

Yet on some occasions he’s been photographed with short sleeves and there is no tattoo visible on either of his arms. This is absolutely incredible, right? That the world’s most famous holocaust survivor is in truth “the emperor wearing no clothes” … the “elephant in the living room.” The world media say nothing because they can’t—they pretend not to notice and hope you do the same.

To get to the point

But why is Marcel Zech, a 27-year old town council member representing the National Democratic Party (NPD) dragged into court and convicted of sedition and inciting hatred because of a tattoo on his lower back that no one would normally see anyway … while Elie Wiesel comes to Germany at age 57, 58 and 81, and with great publicity misrepresents himself as an Auschwitz and Buchenwald concentration camp survivor with the tattoo A7713 on his arm that he doesn’t have, and the German Justice system doesn’t even notice.

I demand that German prosecutors investigate Wiesel’s claim to have a tattoo, and bring charges against him when they find he doesn’t have one, never did have one—charges of defrauding the public and of inciting hatred against Germans as a people.

Let’s take a look at the “crime” of Marcel Zech. According to the photo taken at a pool party, Zech’s tattoo (see image above) is the likeness of a structure that resembles the entrance to the former Birkenau Camp in Poland but there is no name identifying it as such. Under the image are the words Jedem das Seine in large gothic-style letters. Jedem das Seine translates as “To each his own” and was on the gate of the Buchenwald camp entrance, not at Auschwitz or Birkenau.  So what is the connection, what is the message?

I would say there is no message since the image and the phrase don’t go together in the “holocaustian” sense. Is it illegal in Germany to use the words Jedem das Seine? Can’t be.1 Is it illegal in Germany to post or publish an image of the entrance to Birkenau? No, because it’s done all the time, especially by Jews. So what is the problem with Marcel’s tattoo?

The problem is that he is an office-holding member of the NPD, which the federal government in Germany is currently trying to ban. Yes, ban it as a political party. It has been a German political party since 1964!

On the other hand, Elie Wiesel is a Jew, and Jews are never investigated for anything in Germany, let alone found guilty of something. Have you ever heard of it? I did an internet search and came up with nothing.

State prosecutors had demanded that the accused [Zech] be sentenced to 10 months in jail without parole because, according to DW, he seemed to be “a politically motivated criminal, who had trampled on the core values of the German constitution.” What are the “core values” of the German constitution?

Consulting the German Basic Law (constitutional law), I come up with a few:

Art. 3:  No person shall be favored or disfavored because of […] political opinions.

Art. 4:  … freedom to profess a religious or philosophical creed, shall be inviolable.

Art. 5:  Every person shall have the right freely to express and disseminate his opinions in speech, writing, and pictures.

But then there is also Article 139 [Continuing validity of denazification provisions]:
The legal provisions enacted for the “Liberation of the German People from National Socialism and Militarism” shall not be affected by the provisions of this Basic Law.

Get that?–The German people were liberated. At least we know that Germany is still functioning under the 1945 Military Control Council of Supreme Commander Dwight Eisenhower. Not much progress there.

But back to Elie Wiesel: What is the law against impersonating a concentration camp survivor? It appears there is none.  While it’s a crime to minimize the “Holocaust”, it’s perfectly okay to maximize it. Lying about the Holocaust by adding to the narrative is fine; just don’t take anything away from it. Not when you’re in Germany.

[By the way, the Deutsche Welle story repeated a falsehood from a previous story when it said that Buchenwald was “the Nazi regime’s largest death camp.” Buchenwald is not considered to be a “death camp” even by holocaustian historians. Martin Schultz was using the occasion of a 70th anniversary to advise that because of Buchenwald, Germans were obligated to welcome refugees.]


1. From  One has a right to one’s personal preferences, as in I’d never pick that color, but to each his own . Versions of this maxim appeared in the late 1500s but the modern wording was first recorded in 1713.

7 Comments to Tattoo criminals – Elie Wiesel should be investigated for holocaust fraud

  1. by Klaus Borgolte

    On December 24, 2015 at 2:59 pm

    Dear Carolyn,

    I do understand your reasoning.

    But this individuum appalles me. He is neither a decent White, nor decent German patriot or nationalist.

    Since long the German “government” is campaigning against nationalists.I wouldn’t be too surprised if this episode is one of the typical German false flags like the NSU/Zschäpe court case.


  2. by Carolyn

    On December 26, 2015 at 10:38 am

    The fact that the prosecutor asked for 10 months imprisonment without parole, but the court judge gave Zech a 6-month suspended sentence shows that he is not really guilty of anything. Not even Germany’s paragraph 130. It’s a farce, but not a false flag.


  3. by Klaus Borgolte

    On December 24, 2015 at 3:30 pm

    Just a thought – were all prisoners tattooed?
    If yes, than this effort also shows that there was no plan to kill the prisoners.


  4. by Carolyn

    On December 26, 2015 at 10:26 am

    There is very little in the way of reliable records about prisoner tattoos at Auschwitz. To the best of my knowledge, all prisoners who were expected to stay at Auschwitz-Birkenau were tattooed. The very many who were designated as being “in transit” but remained for several weeks under a health quarantine, were not tattooed. A-B was the only camp that tattooed their inmates, and yes, there was no plan to kill them but there is better proof of that than whether they were tattooed or not.


  5. by swedish reader

    On December 25, 2015 at 4:05 am

    In the mid-eighties, a holocaust survivor came to my highschool class, and we sat listening to him for half an hour. I had no doubts whatsoever that everything he said was true. His story was quite down to earth, and not bizarre, like the ‘mengele sort of stories’.
    In the end he suddenly shifted in his mood to confrontive, and he asked us if we wanted to see proof. Before anyone had the time to answer, he quickly pulled up the shirt on his arm, and for a few seconds, showed us a tatoo, a number. I felt as if the lightning had struck, I sat there almost frozen. It made a strong impression on all of us.

    That was a moment I will never forget. But maybe not for the reason he had wished for. Shortly afterwards, I started having critical thoughts about his tatoo. I started asking myself, – exactly what does a tatoo on his arm really prove ? – since he said it was a proof, how can I be sure he did not get it by himself ?
    And I also got doubts about his acting in front of us. No one had said anything critical or shown any disbelief, but anyhow, he made this emotional thing with his arm. I had a strong feeling, that it was his standard finale procedure every time he had an audience. – it was theatre.


  6. by Carolyn

    On January 5, 2016 at 11:05 pm


    German prosecutors have appealed the suspended six-month sentence given to politician Marcel Zech for displaying a Nazi-style tattoo.

    The 27-year-old admitted displaying the tattoo while visiting a swimming pool on Nov. 21 last year.

    Prosecutors’ spokesman Wilfried Lehmann said Tuesday that the sentence “was significantly less” severe than the unsuspended 10-month sentence his colleagues had requested.

    Zech, a member of the far-right National Democratic Party, has also appealed the verdict and is seeking an acquittal.



  1. Tattoo Criminals -- Elie Wiesel Should Be Investigated for Holocaust Fraud « National Vanguard

Leave a Reply

You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

By submitting a comment here you grant Elie Wiesel Cons the World a perpetual license to reproduce your words and name/web site in attribution. Inappropriate or irrelevant comments will be removed at an admin's discretion.

This website makes use of some non-original copyrighted material. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information Click Here