Posted on July 2, 2016 at 1:10 pm

Elie Wiesel is dead

Elie Wiesel receives a standing ovation during Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's Congress speech, March 3, 2015. AFP photo

Elie Wiesel receives a standing ovation during Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s Congress speech, March 3, 2015. To the left, his wife Marion, far left, lawyer Alan Dershowitz. AFP photo


Haaretz announced that Elie Wiesel died today, Saturday, July 2 at the age of 87. Saturday is the Jewish Sabbath when Orthodox Jews are prohibited from any kind of work. The article did not give any indication of how, why, where but is a long history of his life and “achievements.”

His death was announced by a spokesman for Israel’s Holocaust memorial, Yad Vashem on Saturday. “Yad Vashem mourns the passing of Elie Wiesel-Holocaust survivor, Nobel laureate, renowned author,” the museum said on Twitter.

The New York Times writes that Wiesel “died at his home in Manhattan” and that “Menachem Rosensaft, a longtime friend and the founding chairman of the International Network of Children of Jewish Survivors, confirmed the death in a phone call.”

NBC News wrote:

Tributes for Wiesel immediately started pouring in Saturday, with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu calling him a “beacon of light to the humanity of people who believed in the good of everyone.”

The World Jewish Congress President Ronald Lauder said in a statement that Wiesel “was more than a revered writer. He was also a teacher for many of us. He taught us about the horrors of Auschwitz. He taught us about Judaism, about Israel, and about not being silent in the face of injustice.”

Jerusalem Mayor Nir Barkat, who a few months ago gave Wiesel the medal of Honorary Citizen of Jerusalem, said of the author: “Instead of giving in to despair, the face of evil and cruelty that at the time was the darkest of humanity, he carried all the way through the message of tolerance and peace for all peoples of the world.”

And on and on it will continue.

My question is: Will he be buried in Israel? We will know fairly soon.


Categories Featured | Tags:

24 Comments to Elie Wiesel is dead

  1. by Dez

    On July 2, 2016 at 2:15 pm

    Now the con man-liar-shyster can stand in judgment before God… ding dong the weasel’s dead


  2. by Nicholas Ennos

    On July 2, 2016 at 4:10 pm

    How do we know he is dead? Or is he just being retired because has become too embarrassing because he is such an obvious fraud?


  3. by Carolyn

    On July 2, 2016 at 4:14 pm

    You are getting carried away. Don’t be such a conspiracist.


  4. by Not stupid

    On July 2, 2016 at 9:11 pm

    Why are you so fucking stupid? Maybe he won’t show the tattoo because it’s too hard for him too look at himself!?!? What makes you think you have the right to call him a fraud? Even if he didn’t have the tattoo he could go get it done anyway and make you believe he survived the hallocaust. Maybe next time try putting yourself in his shoes and stop being an asshole. I hope you all enjoy rotting in hell where you belong.


  5. by Carolyn

    On July 2, 2016 at 9:31 pm

    Not stupid – Maybe this, maybe that, maybe something else. There is a lot more to Elie Wiesel’s lies and fabrications than just his tattoo. It’s all recounted on this website, but you haven’t read any of it. Therefore you’re no judge.


  6. by Not stupid

    On July 2, 2016 at 9:53 pm

    Weather you choose to believe it or not the truth is this man lived through hell. It’s as simple as that. He was the only person in his family that made it out. His father, his mother and his siblings all died, burned. It is amazing that this man was able to make it out alive. Its truly sick that you say he lied about it all. There are pictures of him and his father in the camp. I’m not sure if you believe that the hallocaust even happened or not but if you don’t I would encourage you to visit auschwits and see for your self that it’s not a joke it’s real and Elie Wiesel lived through it.


  7. by Carolyn

    On July 3, 2016 at 5:45 am

    He was the only person in his family that made it out. WRONG

    His father, his mother and his siblings all died, burned. WRONG

    There are pictures of him and his father in the camp. WRONG

    I would encourage you to visit auschwits. I HAVE, BUT YOU HAVE NOT

    Elie Wiesel lived through it. WRONG

    You call yourself “not stupid” but you know nothing about Wiesel’s life, so it’s stupid of you to make these comments.


  8. by Steven Lewis

    On July 3, 2016 at 12:44 am

    I went to the NY Times article on the Weasel’s death and read some of the comments. There were only 12 at the time but it was still early. The last comment was one you’d expect from a duped white person. The person wrote “I’m so sorry what happened to your people” I wanted to reply but I’m not registered at the Times nor do I want to be or else I would have wrote what about the other 50 plus million that died including the millions of Germans who were brutally massacred.


  9. by a reader

    On July 3, 2016 at 2:40 am

    In the 3rd picture from this TIME’s photo set, the tall youth in the line at left, fourth from the front is Elie Wiesel.

    On Professor Ken Waltzer’s site (now down), wasn’t he the third instead?


  10. by Carolyn

    On July 3, 2016 at 9:59 am

    a reader — yes, you’re right, but this one circulated for awhile and some people are too stupid to know the difference – like Time magazine. But Waltzer was wrong about the third from the front too. I have written about it pretty extensively. I do think that this very photo in which he falsely identified 16-year-old Elie Wiesel (I say falsely rather than wrongly because I think he knew it wasn’t so but thought he could get away with it) … this is what destroyed his career as a “holocaust expert.” Trying to include Wiesel in with the “Boys of Buchenwald” was an impossible task and he finally gave up on it. He never wrote the book, he just wrote a few articles. He is a sad example of a whore for the holocaust industry.

    Thanks for the link to the Time photos, I found another one I like there.


  11. by Talos

    On July 3, 2016 at 3:26 am

    So, the Lying Weasel is dead. But his l(i)egacy lives on. And it won’t die anytime soon.


  12. by eah

    On July 3, 2016 at 4:12 am

    My question is:

    If we will learn, once and for all, whether he has a tattoo or not.


  13. by Carolyn

    On July 3, 2016 at 10:23 am

    eah – I’m disappointed. That is not the right question at all. In fact, it is a very bad question. We already know he doesn’t. You need to read or re-read two articles here and then tell me why you’re not persuaded. First: and second:


  14. by Jonny

    On July 3, 2016 at 4:45 am

    It’s so annoying to see how the media is glorifying this long exposed liar Mr. Wiesel. It’s so funny how his stories are easily disproven with simple research, yet there is never any mention in the media about the controversy. It just shows you the Jewish control and desire to keep the long debunked gas chamber holocaust theory alive. No doubt we’ll be having tax payer funded statues of Wiesel made and holohoax museums named after him in the years to come.


  15. by Christopher

    On July 3, 2016 at 9:48 am

    The Lying Wiesel is Dead!
    It just goes to show that Jews can be conned by bald-faced liars like Wiesel. Yes, Jews have been fooled just as much as their simple minded Gentiles & media lickspittles. The liar has been exposed for years and the proof of the scam is attacked. Isn’t that revealing? The con-man’s story should be moved into the “FICTION” section of the library. It’s a whale of a story but still nonsense known to everybody but those who still believe in Santa Claus and his reindeer.


  16. by eah

    On July 3, 2016 at 10:52 am


    On the page Elie admits he doesn’t have the tattoo A7713 you write:

    In courts of law, whenever a claimant fails to provide proof of his claim, he forfeits his right to that claim. Wiesel has failed to provide proof that he has the tattoo so he must give up the claim. This is the clearest admission he could make, would you not agree? (My emphasis.)

    No, I would not agree — and here is why:

    Wiesel keeps his arm covered at all times in public and is never asked about it by the complicit media. (My emphasis.)

    I’m afraid an abstruse argument like the one you make would not be enough to convince the wider public that Wiesel is a fraud — due to complicity and power of the media. And to me this wider discrediting of Wiesel and his ‘Holocaust’ persona is what is important.


  17. by Carolyn

    On July 3, 2016 at 3:06 pm

    eah – So you don’t agree that Wiesel’s failure to allow the public (the public that buys his books and pays for the US Holocaust Museum, etc.) to see him publicly showing his tattoo, as every other ‘survivor’ does to prove they were there, is “the clearest admission he could make.” You call it an abtruse argument that is not enough to convince the wider public that Wiesel is a fraud.

    You are conflating two different things here. First, that my argument that Wiesel’s failure to show his tattoo for 60 years now is an admission that he doesn’t have one is abstruse … and second, it doesn’t convince the wider public. But I didn’t mention anything about convincing the wider public – that’s your idea. I simply made a great case that Wiesel’s refusal to show his arm to the cameras was inexcusable and could only be because he doesn’t have one. We also have the pictures to prove it.

    I did not write this thinking the “wider public” would hear about it. I wrote it for people like you who continue to bemoan “when will we find out whether he has a tattoo?” … “Does he or doesn’t he?.” I’m telling you, cut that out! – we know already that he doesn’t have it. We don’t need his confirmation.

    You take the weak road; I take the strong road.

    If you think we must reach the wider public (it would be nice!) then it up to you to try to do that. The wider European/American public is not too interested in what has been mainly a debate between revisionists and jews. I think those who write angry letters about my content are all Jews defending their Jewish fables and privileges. I don’t publish very many of them.

    I believe that the argument I made is tight and holds up. Without a doubt, Elie Wiesel never had the tattoo A7713 because it was on Lazar Wiesel’s arm, and you are doing revisionism a disservice by doubting it rather than proclaiming it.

    No one will ever see that arm now, will they.


  18. by David

    On July 3, 2016 at 6:28 pm

    To Not Stupid – You ARE stupid.

    This guy was a fraud. When Miklos Gruner, who was undisputedly at the camp and who had Lazar Wiesel as a friend was taken to meet this insidious liar he stated that it was NOT the man with whom he was imprisoned.

    Gruner’s friend had tattoo number A7713 – which liar Wiesel claimed to have had. Gruner had no doubt that this guy was a fake. Gruner’s presence at the camp is beyond question and this is what he flat-out claimed about liar Wiesel – that he was an imposter.

    In addition, tattoo number A7712, which liar Wiesel claimed belonged to his father ACTUALLY belonged to Gruner’s older brother. Camp records PROVE that.

    Wiesel was a fraud pure and simple. To lie about something like this – to lie to and mislead the whole world – is nothing short of evil and wretched and diabolical.

    This guy insidiously lied to advance and enrich HIMSELF.

    The reason he never showed his tattoo is because he never HAD it in the first place. He could not just go out and get a fake tattoo. If a liar of his notoriety did that it would surely leak out and expose him as the wicked and sinister liar that he was – and he knew it.

    Wiesel was an insidious and diabolical fraud and that is what all CREDIBLE evidence supports.


  19. by Craig

    On July 4, 2016 at 6:22 am

    I have only one thing to say about The Lying Wiesel, “Good riddance to bad rubbish”.


  20. by eah

    On July 4, 2016 at 12:55 pm

    You take the weak road; I take the strong road.

    David Irving – Lies of the Nuremberg Trials

    In this and other Irving videos of the time (late ’80s, early ’90s) you can hear him say that the ‘Holocaust’ myth is fast unraveling — it’s only a matter of a couple of years or so, at most. He relates how he tells Jewish friends that they showed good sense in abandoning absurd tales of shrunken heads and soap made from the fat of Jews, and now they ought to stop pushing the gas chamber fraud, since it’s on its last legs.

    It is weird (and sad) listening to that now, knowing what happens later: Irving is jailed in Austria, his career devastated, he loses the Lipstadt libel suit, etc etc.

    And the ‘Holocaust’ story is as widely believed as ever, pushed constantly by a ‘complicit media’.

    What can put a a dent in that? Incontrovertible proof that Wiesel was a fraud would have gotten a lot of attention.


  21. by Carolyn

    On July 4, 2016 at 1:45 pm

    eah – I’m not sure what you’re getting at, but I think you’re lost. DI was bragging based on work other people had done, then he turned and wimped out on the ‘gas chambers’. The Elie Wiesel tattoo case is very different from that. The problem is people (like you?) saying we need a confession from Wiesel’s own mouth. That’s like saying ‘eye-witness testimony’ is necessary, forensic evidence is not.


  22. by Al Milligan

    On July 4, 2016 at 5:18 pm

    Carolyn, Thank you for keeping a cool head and responding to the real deniers of the truth on Weasel’s tattoo. He is dead and can never be redeemed. But we can be if we do not try to foster the lie of the holocaust. You are right. The proofs are in. There are many people who are Jews by religion who agree with you. It is a false witness who demeans the German people as Weasel did. There was a holocaust, though. It was perpetrated by those who started the IIWW. The German men, women, and children in the millions were burned alive by them. Are they war criminals? There, perhaps, is one of the reasons there is so much denial from these false witnesses. They lie, tell you they are lying, but say that it’s not really a lie because they believe it in their hearts. Consider Joseph Hirt or Herman Rosenblat.


  23. by B. Holst

    On July 5, 2016 at 2:18 am

    Well, to some degree Mr. Wiesel can also bee seen as a rightfully victim, because he was probably raised to hate all non-jews from he was just a kid.

    Young innocent minds who are exposed to the hateful and racist nature of the satanic Talmud are literally molded into becoming treacherous bigots and evil doers.

    It is probably in some way comparable to the vicious circle of child molestation; where the victims often becomes perpetrators them self at a later stage in life.

    Jews have to stop being haters and realise that we live in 2016.


  24. by Carolyn

    On July 5, 2016 at 6:45 am

    You’re on to something there, B. Holst. Wiesel reveals this all the time. In my article “Elie admits his true stories never happened”, I quoted from an essay in his book A Jew Today:

    I understood that all these [Christian] people [in his town as a child] … should want my undoing, even my death. True, we inhabited the same landscape, but that was yet another reason for them to hate me. Such is man’s nature: he hates what disturbs him, what eludes him. We depended on the more or less unselfish tolerance of the “others,” yet our life followed its own course independently of theirs, a fact they clearly resented. Our determination to maintain and enrich our separate history, our separate society, confused them as much as did that history itself.

    He never acknowledges that they live in the “others” land, that they are strangers and want to remain strangers. He does not give the Christrians credit for allowing them to be there, for being tolerant and unselfish. No, all credit for goodness goes to the outsider Jews who demand that the rightful heirs of the land allow them the same privileges they have but also allow them their separate existence, their separate way of life.

    Then they conspire against the Christian world and help its enemies. This is the Jewish outlook and method of operation. This is what has to change.


Leave a Reply

You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

By submitting a comment here you grant Elie Wiesel Cons the World a perpetual license to reproduce your words and name/web site in attribution. Inappropriate or irrelevant comments will be removed at an admin's discretion.

This website makes use of some non-original copyrighted material. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information Click Here