Posted on October 25, 2011 at 10:11 pm

Is Elie Wiesel “the world’s most famous hypocrite”

By Carolyn Yeager

…instead of the world’s most famous Holocaust survivor?

Just one year ago, Elie Wiesel gave a speech in Connecticut, while a jury was in session just miles away, calling for the death penalty to NOT be given to two men who had committed an appalling crime against a family of four. Wrapping himself in self-righteousness, he intoned “Death is not the answer” to the man, William Petit, who had lost his wife and two beautiful young daughters to a couple of amoral monsters, and to Petit’s supporters.

The crime committed was so brutal and horrible, and senseless too,  that for this writer the death penalty is too good for these perpetrators. You can read about it here and here.

Did Elie Wiesel have the right to barge into this family’s tragedy as some sort of “spiritual advisor”,  for which he was not asked? Of course not. Did he have any right to bring his “holocaust experience” into their personal grief as some kind of Jewish lesson in humanity? No,  and it’s in the worst of taste but he is used to flaunting his imaginary suffering to audiences who have been indoctrinated and conditioned to respond like Pavlov’s dogs to his trite phrases.

The murderers of this family should not be given the death penalty, says Elie Wiesel.

Left, Haley, 17 and Michaela, 11 with their 48 year-old mother Jennifer Petit–all torture-murdered. Sole survivor William Petit on right.

 

 

 

 

Wiesel tells them, “I know your pain … believe me, I know.” Does he? He is oblivious to this man’s pain when he tells him he should not desire the death penalty for those who committed such savage acts upon his loved ones.  We know exactly what happened to these three women with horrifying exactitude. We do NOT know what happened to Wiesel’s mother, father and sister. With the Petits we have the bodies, and the manner of death and the culprits are forensically determined; not so with Wiesel’s family and so many others–no bodies and no forensic evidence at all. Their deaths, especially in the manner assumed, remain conjecture.

It seems Wiesel wants to prevent Gentiles from getting  justice for evil done to them, while justice for Jews has always required full punishment … an eye for an eye. He recently called for bringing Mamoud Ahmadinejad to trial as a war criminal at the Hague simply because he has said he doesn’t believe in the mythical Holocaust. Wiesel wants to make holocaust denial a crime in the U.S. and put “deniers” in prison. Yet he also wants these child rapists and souless murderers to remain in prison for life, being fed, clothed and given health care, side by side with holocaust deniers!

Is Elie Wiesel an evil force in the world or just a fool?

Iran has the death penalty. We need the death penalty to deter human trash like these two murderers. Wiesel’s campaign to abolish the death penalty in the U.S. is part of the attempt to further destroy our society and beautiful, gifted white people.

“Death is not the answer” for men who tie girls to their beds, rape them, douse them with gasoline and set them on fire, says Elie Wiesel.

Haley’s bed on which she was tied to be burned to death. The same was done to her younger sister.

What we know happened in Cheshire, Connecticut has no relation to what happened to Elie Wiesel’s family in 1944 in Hungary and Poland. I believe it is the fire–the torching of the live bodies and of the house itself–that drew Wiesel’s attention to this case. The religio/historical accounts written by Jews, such as in the Talmud, are suffused with stories of being burned (destroyed) by fire. Elie Wiesel himself coined the term “holocaust” to describe the expulsion, deportation and incarceration (not incineration) of Jews in concentration camps that took place in 1942-45. Even though many deaths did occur, none were by fire or burning. However, Jewish mythology demands fiery deaths.

Left: The Petit family home set ablaze by the murderers to conceal their DNA.

 

In addition to his offensiveness to Petit and his sister and mother who attended the trial with him, Elie Wiesel is a hypocrite because he never said “Death is not the answer” when Germans were being put to death by the hundreds as “Nazis” and nazi collaborators. He never said “Death is not the answer” when Adolf Eichmann was sentenced to die by an all-Jewish court proceeding in Israel. He never said “Death is not the answer” as Israelis murdered Palestinians in secret prisons. But once he decided to make a reputation for himself as a humanitarian, he has taken up opposition to the death penalty.

Why the death penalty? Well, to prevent justice for families like the Petits, who are white and blonde. Their sufferings should never be taken as seriously as the ‘holocaust of the Jews.’ Wiesel has likened the death of a Jewish child as equivalent to, or greater in significance than, the death of Jesus Christ. The burning death of 11 year-old Michaela can never be allowed to compete with a Jewish child.~

Addendum (added Wed. Oct. 26)

Both of the murderers have been found guilty and one, Steven Hayes, has been given the death penalty. The younger man, Joshua Komisarjevsky is currently back in court for the penalty phase which began yesterday.  His attorneys plan to highlight Komisarjevsky’s “troubled” childhood, and that he didn’t get the “help” he needed.

Well, of course, people who do things like Hayes and Komisarjevsky did have “troubled childhoods;”  there is something wrong with them from birth. But all those who experience difficult childhoods don’t do what they did. We cannot allow offenders to weasel out of paying an appropriate price for their destruction of other’s lives and property; if we do, no one can be held responsible for anything … which is pretty much what has happened to our society.

Even if this sick person also receives the death penalty, which I hope he does, it will be years before either one of them faces what the jury recommended for them. In the meantime, Elie Wiesel will be doing all he can to help them weasel out of it.

28 Comments to Is Elie Wiesel “the world’s most famous hypocrite”

  1. by Alex

    On October 26, 2011 at 11:27 am

    Ellie did not complain when Israelis burnt 800 Gazan children crisp using white phosphorus. I do not think that he even commented on that Jewish crime or even said something about it, other than praise his Zionist masters.

     

  2. by J Longman

    On October 26, 2011 at 11:45 am

    One day soon, Elie Weisel will be exposed to the world for the hypocrite he is and so too the Holocaust which is the greatest fraud perpetrated upon our gullible people. The indisputable evidence is accumulating thick and fast mainly due to the high academic standard of your research and analytical skills, Carolyn. Another excellent nail in our predators’ coffin.

     

  3. by Jessica

    On October 26, 2011 at 3:16 pm

    Another irony: Wiesel was a strong proponent of the Iraq war, justifying it because Iraq was, according to him, a “terrorist state.” He said not one word about the *totally innocent* Iraqi civilians who would certainly be killed by American bombs. Nothing. Where was their right to life? And yet he defends the right of rapists and heinous murderers to live? (By the way, I am opposed to the death penalty.)

     

  4. by deborah

    On October 26, 2011 at 4:35 pm

    When Americans wake up to the truth it will be a red pill moment…they lie. They fricking lie about everything. My grandfather a Spanish Jew told me, “question everything, do not accept the pitiful explanation of thieves”…so from that day forth I QUESTION EVERYTHING. My grandfather was a jew that was not a jew. Bless his heart…he lead the way. Just read the BALIFORE DECLARATION for truth and then Leacher report for more truth. When the shit hits the fan the jews will be begging for mercy…liars.

     

  5. by Fatina

    On October 26, 2011 at 9:58 pm

    No surprise here. I’m guessing the Komisarjevsky douche is a Holy Tribe Member and I wouldn’t be surprised if Hayes is as well. No wonder he wants forgiveness for them… they must not have even committed a crime in Weasel’s eyes. They only killed a few shiksas, what’s the big deal goyim?

     

  6. by Carolyn

    On October 27, 2011 at 8:26 am

    The killers don’t have to be Jewish to kill white people. Wiesel’s attitude doesn’t have to stem from that, either. Whites killing whites is just fine with him. The Jewish liberal viewpoint is to allow criminals to run rampant in our society while we protect their rights and make excuses for them … like having a fundamentalist Christian upbringing! That’s always a favorite one. In fact, it’s killing two birds with one stone: murdering “privileged whites” and blaming it onto “rigid” Christian belief systems.

     

  7. by Jett Rucker

    On October 27, 2011 at 1:45 pm

    I’m not interested in Wiesel’s opinion regarding the death penalty.

    I’m not interested in Yeager’s, either.

    But if other people want to hear from either of these on the subject, they should both feel free to let fly.

     

  8. by J M Damon

    On October 27, 2011 at 4:37 pm

    Why does Carolyn call Mr. Wiesel a “hypocrite?”

    Apparently the Petit family were not Jewish.
    If Mr. Wiesel is the sort of Jew who considers non-Jews non-human, then he is not hypocritical if he considers their murder of little significance.

     

  9. by Carolyn

    On October 28, 2011 at 8:33 am

    Hi J M,

    You make a point. However, If Wiesel were honest about his beliefs/feelings toward capital punishment, he would have to admit that he distinguishes between Jews and non-Jews, as you say. Because he doesn’t admit it but puts on a public face of caring about all people equally, he is a hypocrite. That’s just one example of his hypocrisy. If degenerates began killing Jews, as they are now killing blonde white people by invading their homes and murdering them in cold blood, would Wiesel change his tune? You bet he would.

    In addition, to speak publicly in Connecticut, only a short distance away from where this trial was concurrently going on, and addressing his remarks to the grieving husband-father of the tortured-murdered women, putting his latter-day “anti-death-penalty crusade” first and foremost in importance over what happened to this family, is outrageous Hutzpah. Hutzpah is hypocrisy because it’s a giving to one’s own self and cause more importance in the scheme of things … and not in self-defense either.

    These are important issues in relation to Elie Wiesel re the whole matter of Jewish suffering. I’m glad I wrote about it and so are many others as can be seen by the immediate response. I’ve also gotten quite a few emails from readers.

    To Jett Rucker: The anti-death penalty crusade has become a major focus of Eile Wiesel’s “work”, for which he no doubt receives financial contributions, so it is a legitimate subject for this web site. To not be interested in his opinion is to ignore that he is using his clout to influence legislation in every state in the U.S. What the abolition of the death penalty means to white America is horrible to consider … if you care about white people, which I do.

     

  10. by Jack Martin

    On October 27, 2011 at 4:41 pm

    Elie has an insatiable need for attention.
    Were it not for the “Holocaust” fable and his apparently fraudulent claims concerning his own connection with that notorious “Hoax of the Twentieth Century,” he would have passed through this world unnoticed.
    The bogus “Holocaust” transformed into an important “somebody,” a person who otherwise would surely have been seen, by those whose paths he crossed, as the insignificant nobody that he actually is.
    His involvement in this death penalty case is just a cheap publicity stunt calculated to elevate his status among those who are easily impressed by such sleazy theatrics.
    Interestingly, the name Wiesel is German for ‘weasel.’
    According to my dictionary, one of the definitions of “weasel” is… “a person regarded as sneaky or treacherous.”
    It would seem that, in Elie’s case, the name is well suited to the person.

     

  11. by Robert Schmidt

    On October 28, 2011 at 3:56 am

    I have nothing more to say about WEASEL ..EXCEPT show us your tattoo! forthwith !…before you launch ANY further DIATRIBE !!!

     

  12. by SHAFAR NULLIFIDIAN

    On October 28, 2011 at 7:11 pm

    One need not be a “white supremacist” nor a neo-Nazi, nor one seeking to rehabilitate the image of Adolph Hitler, or an anti-Semite to assert with utmost confidence that Eely the Weasel is one of the most contemptibly despicable, repulsive, revulsion generating, socipathic, monomaniacal, malevolent creatures on the planet. He gives new meaning to the term misanthrope. His mendacity and hypocrisy have no limits. They are like infinity squared.
    The Weasel depiction of his “eye-witnessed” experiences are not only incoherent, inconsistent…they are scientifically impossible to have occurred. His “experiences” are nothing more than the delusions from the malevolent mind of a truly evil creature.

    And yet… this reptilian brained atavist is a highly revered spokesperson on behalf of the alleged 4 or 5 or 6 million Jews who allegedly died as victims in alleged death camps in alleged gas chambers as per the alleged coded order issued allegedly by none other than Adolph Hitler, himself. I used the term “alleged and allegedly because ther no forensic evidence whatsoever of any of the above allegations. None! Nada! Nie!

    And thus the libel, the slander the beatings, the arson, the fines and incarceration that one sees wreaked upon decent, honest scientists, ruining of reputations of those whose peer reviewed results of their work bear out the truth of their findings but rarely see the light of day because of the influence of the self proclaimed Exceptionalist Chosen who occupy the seat of power or are the puppet masters of those whom the masses of ovibovine so intellectually, morally and culturally slothful, think they have democratically elected. Of all the events of which the world has been misinformed, disinformed and remains uninformed, the one that has had the most devastatingly dire circumstances on the United States of America is the Jewish account of the holocaust.

    Elie Wiesel is the “Carny Barker” for the Clattering Carnival Clowns of Calumny.

     

  13. by Carlos Porter

    On October 29, 2011 at 5:18 am

    Congratulations on this article. It takes courage today to say that the death penalty is too good for people like that. Words fail me. The whole article completely takes my breath away. I note, however, that the younger of the 2 killers, the one with the Polish name, was “adopted” by typically brainless, clueless liberals with all sorts of “contacts” in the “arts”. These are the sort of people who support Wiesel. No doubt Mommy and Daddy will use their money to see that their precious little darling never has to suffer as he so richly deserves. Maybe they slipped Wiesel a donation? No doubt his support is always for sale. To me this is a case that really calls for the reintroduction of the old principle of an eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth.

     

  14. by Carolyn

    On October 29, 2011 at 2:04 pm

    Dear Carlos Porter,
    I’m very gratified that you have commented here. I have read many of your writings. Yes, I think to deter sexual predators like Komisarjevsky there must be a death penalty and it must be swift. Our problem is that it can take 15 years to execute someone, what with endless appeals and postponing of trial dates, etc.. In this age of DNA testing, there is no excuse for it. It is the result of conflicted thinking about who is a victim and a lack of will. And we know where that comes from. As you suggest, we would have a better society by far (not perfect) if we simply went by payment in kind for actions and left out all the psychologizing bs. Many of these killers would simply kill themselves if they knew or believed they were going to be caught, saving society the trouble. And many others would not carry out the crime to begin with.

     

  15. by Vincent Nunes

    On October 29, 2011 at 11:52 am

    Carolyn, I’m about saving the good of humanity from the scum.

    Hayes and Komisarjevsky should burn like their victims, and every other cowardly scumbag from this point forth, until the bastards realize that We The People will no longer put up with their predations.

    Truth needs no laws; only lies and liars require them – but maybe we need a law to safeguard TRUTH ITSELF.

     

  16. by Carolyn

    On October 29, 2011 at 2:09 pm

    Hi Vincent,
    I don’t think we can pass a law about Truth, but I like the rest of what you say!

     

  17. by Carlos Porter

    On October 30, 2011 at 12:55 am

    Thank you. This gets more interesting by the minute. I am sorry I referred to the younger killer as “the one with the Polish name”. What kind of name is “Komisarjevsky”? Russian? What does this name mean? “Son of a Kommissar”? What kind of family adopted him? Are they “Russian immigrants”, i.e., Jewish? They are certainly liberals and obviously have some money. Did they pay Wiesel to butt into this? Is this why “Komisarjevsky” is being protected? I wouldn’t believe a name like that if I saw it in a comic book. Truth is stranger than fiction. Is there is some hidden “Holocaust” angle to the story from the family point of view? Again, I apologize for saying the name was Polish.

     

  18. by Carolyn

    On October 30, 2011 at 9:13 am

    You’re right, the name sounds Russian. The parents first names are Ben and Jude! Although Ben is short for Benedict and the entire family are strongly Christian, going how far back I don’t know. One thing: The name could be spelled Komisar-jew-sky since v’s and w’s are interchangeable. Joshua was adopted and his parentage is “unknown.” The most revealing article I”ve seen so far is here: http://articles.courant.com/2011-10-27/news/hc-komisarjevsky-penalty3-1028-20111027_1. There are other detailed articles at courant.com, such as http://articles.courant.com/2011-09-22/news/hc-komisarjevsky-day4-0923-20110922_1

    All the playing up of Joshua’s sexual “molestation” by another child in the home is overblown. It was NOT rape. Apparently, when a foster daughter Beverly claimed the male foster child in the home had “tried to sexually assault her”, Joshua, when asked several times if he had also been assaulted, said No. Later on (some years?) Beverly claimed her “brother” Joshua had sexually assaulted her. When questioned, he first denied it, then said, “OK, I did it.” Since Beverly ultimately forgave Joshua, according to the mother, and “now they are very close,” it couldn’t have been too bad. Prosecutors got Ben K. to admit that basically the home he provided was safe and comfortable.

    The defense went so far as to tell the jury that the mother, Jude, was molested by a foster child who lived in her home when she was young! There is a lot of this going around–some of it could even be put down to childhood curiosity, as in “playing doctor”–without it turning those children involved into sadistic rapists/killers.

    Joshua set a fire at a boarded up gas station when he was 15, after which he was hospitalized as “depressed and suicidal.” He joined the Army National Guard but was discharged because of trouble with the law. Abusing drugs, he began breaking into people’s homes. Police said he planned his burglaries. At this time he fathered a child with a female drug abuser and won custody of the child (which he later lost). Then he met Steven Hayes at a cocaine-treatment program at the Hartford Halfway House where he was staying after being released from prison in 2006.

    Prosecutors on Tuesday showed offical court documents of Komisarjevsky’s 19 previous criminal convictions for burglaries he committed in Burlington, Bristol, Farmington and Cheshire in 2001 and 2002.

    In 2006 he returned to living with his parents and “fighting for custody” for his now 5 year old daughter; father Ben thought that showed “responsibility.”

    His parents are not liberals, but probably apolitical. They are not rich; the family home was old and not that well kept up. However they think, or thought, that they can take something bad and make it into something good based on their religious faith. It can’t be done, as even Jesus said: Good fruit cannot come from a bad tree. Joshua himself knows what he is and has said many times that he is no good.

    I can imagine Wiesel simply opportunistically using this case for his anti-death penalty campaign when he was speaking at a college in Connecticut, without even knowing all the facts. I haven’t found any connections to the Komisarjevsky family.

     

  19. by veritas6464

    On October 31, 2011 at 12:14 am

    How is this horrible act any of Wiesel’s business? I “H word” the yids, Libya was the final straw for me – no more tolerence of these child-molesters – I have had enough – the sooner we get on with Armageddon the better – let’s be rid of these satanic parasites once and for always!

    veritas

     

  20. by Carolyn

    On November 1, 2011 at 10:55 am

    FYI — The following is information from a Russian language expert. I’m posting it in the interests of clarification, and for what it’s worth, because there was speculation on the Komisarjevsky family’s ethnicity, including by me, in some of the comments on this article.-cy
    ****

    Joshua Komisarjevsky, the one in question, is the grandson of Fiodor Fiodorovich Komissarzhevski (actually, the adopted son of his son), a famous Russian stage director.

    The Russian word “komissar” had a different meaning before 1917; it meant “commissioner”. Fiodor Komissarzhevski was born before 1917, his name has nothing to do with Soviets commissars.

    As far as the origin of this name is concerned, according to a Russian site on this topic(http://vimeni.ru/surnames/K/Komissarzhevskii/), this is a Russian name of Polish origin that is formed of the word “komissar”(commissar) and the ending “ovskiy” (ovsky, ovski). It is spelled slightly different in Russian. It doesn’t mean “son” necessarily now (although this was its meaning several centuries ago); “ovskiy” is a standard ending of Russian names (usually of those of Polish origin).

    Fiodor, on the other hand, is a true Russian name. I suppose that his mother might have been Jewish. The fact is that many Polish Jews found themselves in Czarist Russia after Poland was divided in the late 18th century, so the Russians whose name ended with “skiy” were actually Polish Jews by their origin. Of course, it was a long time ago; they have “gentilized” since that, so a guy with the name Petrovskiy or Koretskiy (for example) is, most probably, a 100% Russian.

    Fiodor Fiodorovich is a purely Russian name. “Fiodorovich” means that his father was Fiodor too. There’s nothing Jewish in it.

     

  21. by Eric Hunt

    On November 1, 2011 at 2:27 pm

    It’d be great if Carlos Porter weighed in on the tattoo issue in an article on this site.

    I am more likely to believe his theory, that most if not all Jews were not tattooed rather than Wiesel stealing an identity.

    – Where’s Gruner’s tattoo?

     

  22. by GREZCM

    On November 3, 2011 at 11:20 am

    Surname “Komisarjevsky” is slavic in origin, obviously not necessary Polish. It’s very nice of Mr. Porter to retract on this matter.
    Wiesel’s engagement in reported affair may be a clue, that this Komisarjevsky fellow may have at least a drop of Jewish blood. Wiesel is known for his engagement in defending “persecuted” Jews, see the case of Khodorkovsky.
    Greetings from Poland.

     

  23. by wogga

    On December 9, 2011 at 2:38 pm

    What a wacko website you’ve got. If you were building a case against an individual you shoot yourselves in the foot by being anti jewish in so many of your posts. So Wiesel doesn’t support the death penalty because he’s seen a lot of hatred and death? Probably if you asked him ‘if you DID support it, would you suggest these 2 get it’, he’d say ‘yep’.

     

  24. by Carolyn

    On December 10, 2011 at 7:29 am

    You are the wacko. You “probably” know nothing about Elie Wiesel except the general hoopla. Since he has come out squarely against the death penalty, he couldn’t truthfully answer what he would think IF he supported it, which he doesn’t. Maybe you’re using Jewish logic? I just read a comment by a Jew on this Orthodox Jewish website who said: “Elie Wiesel is CREATING anti-Semitism by his sticking his nose in this case.” I agree. Wiesel is the cause of many people becoming anti-Jewish, or more anti-Jewish than they were before. Maybe you should do something about wacko Wiesel.

     

  25. by Logan C

    On May 7, 2015 at 4:38 pm

    Elie Wiesel didn’t receive the Nobel Piece Prize for no reason. He is a great man and has overcome some horrific events that we can’t begin to even imagine the pain and suffering that he experienced. If I had to live in one of those concentration camps I don’t know if I would have the tremendous amount of courage that he possesses to write or speak out about it. Plus, he was the only person in his immediate family to survive, so that makes it even worse. There is no reason to be calling this man hypocritical. He didn’t do anything wrong or hypocritical here. also, people just end up bringing this down to a religious battle in the end. I am Christian, it doesn’t matter what religion or race you are it matters what kind of character you have and how you act. There is no reason we should be hating on Mr. Wiesel after reading just one thing that may or may not be the way that things actual happened. Instead of hating on Mr. Wiesel we should be mourning the deaths of this family and trying to find the positives in life.

     

  26. by Carolyn

    On May 8, 2015 at 5:53 pm

    Poor Logan.

    If I had to live in one of those concentration camps I don’t know if I would have the tremendous amount of courage that he possesses to write or speak out about it.

    Wiesel wasn’t in those camps so he’s not qualified to describe them. There were non-Jewsh people, French and German mostly, who were there and describe them very differently. Even Jews testified about the soccer teams they were on and how they were sent to different camps to work, depending on their skills. They were not mistreated.

    Plus, he was the only person in his immediate family to survive, so that makes it even worse.

    False. His two sisters survived. You don’t know anything about him, do you? And we don’t really know whether any of his family died. He can’t prove it. It’s his say-so only.

    He’s a hypocrite for not wanting the death penalty for this man who horrifically killed a White Christian family. You have no sympathy for them, it’s clear from the way you write. Why not just mourn the WWII deaths — all of them — and find the positives in life … instead of what Wiesel and the Holocaust Industry does?

    So will you have the courage to respond and answer my questions to you, Logan?

     

  27. by JT

    On May 11, 2015 at 9:20 am

    That kid probably wont respond because he is a little pussy. Nobody gives a shot about Elie wiesel. The Holocaust wasnt real and all you peoples is.

     

Trackbacks

  1. Is Elie Wiesel "the world’s most famous hypocrite" …

Leave a Reply

You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

By submitting a comment here you grant Elie Wiesel Cons the World a perpetual license to reproduce your words and name/web site in attribution. Inappropriate or irrelevant comments will be removed at an admin's discretion.

This website makes use of some non-original copyrighted material. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information Click Here